I consider myself responsible and not materialistic, but I need a man on my level. I have my own car, place, full-time job, and I’m studying. If a man lives at his mom’s past 30 without good reasons, that’s a problem. Many women wonder if they should date blue-collar men even if things aren’t perfect. What really matters—ambition or circumstances? Should a man’s current situation affect your choice to date him?

A man responded: just because a guy loses his job, doesn’t mean the relationship is over. He’s 28, no car, lives with his mom for many reasons but is loyal and puts in 100% for his partner. Love is not about comfort or money—it’s about support. If you can’t love someone in bad times, you don’t deserve to love them in good times. Effort and heart should be the deal-breakers, not possessions.

The man adds that judging people by income is sad. He’s helped friends without expecting anything and believes love isn’t about shallow things. You risk missing true love by focusing on matching dollar-for-dollar. I agreed partly—money doesn’t define worth, but financial security provides peace of mind. I’m not against dating blue-collar men but find their outlook on life sometimes limiting and conflicting with my independent nature.

I don’t date a 28-year-old man living at home with no car—it’s a lifestyle issue and suggests setbacks or lack of growth. I want love, but financial security matters too. Sharing bills and saving together allows me to maintain my lifestyle without downgrading for love. Ideal relationships combine emotional connection with some economic stability. Love can conquer a lot, but money impacts how comfortable and sustainable the partnership feels.